Major Business Processes Such As Production-Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Major Business Processes Such As Production? Answer: Introduction: Enterprise resource planning refers to the fully integrated management of the major business processes such as production, finance, logistics, human resources and accounting. Enterprise resource planning integrates the business processes and the flow of the information within an organization in order to ensure optimum utilization of organizational resources such as men, money, material and machine (Leon 2014). Enterprise resource planning ensures one database, single user interface and single application. With the rapid growth in the business environment, the organizations are required to change their ways of conducting business operations. In order to remain competitive, the organizations are required to control their costs. The organizations are also required to remain flexible in order to remain competitive in the rapidly changing customer requirements. Enterprise resource planning has evolved from Material Requirement Planning system that integrates the information between manufa cturers, suppliers and customers with the help of Internet, WAN, etc. Enterprise resource planning is a peoples project as they are the people who design suitable ERP systems, implement them within an organization and accept the implementation of ERP systems (Pai and Rane 2014). Organizations nowadays invest huge amounts in ERP systems. There are several organizations, which have successfully implemented ERP systems and have received the benefits therein. However, there are still many organizations, which have failed to draw benefits from the ERP systems. An important way of realizing the benefits of ERP systems is using package customization however; it is difficult to reach an efficient ERP system that satisfies all the needs of the organization. The level of customization also defines the benefit realization level derived from the implementation of the ERP system. The organizations that have a better alignment of the organizational processes and the tailoring systems have an increased possibility of realizing the benefits related to the ERP systems. Very less research have been conducted on the relationship between customization of ERP systems and realization of benefits. This particular report shall emphasize upon examining the role of customization of E RP on the realization of benefits. The report shall utilize exploratory and investigative research method and shall consider case studies for understanding the topic. However, the report shall include the factors that impact the performance of the organizations when an ERP system is implemented therein (Shaul and Tauber 2013). Characteristics of Enterprise resource planning system: Nowadays, a majority of the organizations all over the world have begun to implement ERP systems especially SAP. Despite, several organizations use almost same ERP systems, the level of customization differs and so does the advantages and disadvantages derived from the ERP systems. It is only when the particular factors are incorporated in the processes, the benefits are realized from the ERP systems (Al-Mashari and Al-Mosheleh 2015). The importance of ERP systems cannot be ignored due to the significant objective they serve. Therefore the report mentions the characteristics of ERP systems and the factors that aid in the realization of benefits. ERP provides multiple facilities and helps in the business planning activities, handling of resources and materials, operational planning and many more. ERP covers all the major business functions such as manufacturing, human resources, inventory, sales and distribution, purchases and many more. EPR enhances the customer services by performing all the core activities that ultimately helps in improving the brand image of an organization. ERP reduces the gap of information between the organizations. ERP offers full integration system acrossthe departments as well as between the companies. ERP aids in the efficient management of the projects by eliminating the issues of material shortage, cash management, customer service, quality issues, etc. ERP provides several intelligent tools for enabling better decisions such as Management information system, Decision support system, etc. ERP enables introduction of technologies such as Internet, Intranet, Electronic Fund Transfer and many more (Tarhini, Ammar and Tarhini 2015). Organizations nowadays implement ERP systems in order to integrate their financial data or information. ERP ensures that there are no deviations and zero error in the actual financial information of an organization. ERP helps in integrating the information pertaining to the customer orders. ERP systems integrate the entire process of purchasing by the customers beginning from placing an order to the delivery of the products and services. This helps in keeping a better track of the orders and coordinating the activities of manufacturing, inventory and shipping simultaneously in several locations. ERP systems enable the manufacturing companies to speed up their processes by offering standard methods that automate the manufacturing process (Tian and Xu 2015). ERP implementation in organizations There are several benefits derived by the organizations when they implement ERP systems as a majority of the organizations become capable of solving various issues related to technology, diminishing inventories, reduction in expenses and reducing the process duration. However, the organizations nowadays are seeking for methods that shall aid them in the achievement of investment optimization. This involves the extension of the functions of the ERP, which is also called the utilization of second wave such as optimization via continuous planning, managing customer relationships and warehousing data. Hoch and Dulebohn (2013) has found that the major reason behind the failure of an ERP system is the cost of ERP implementation and the reduction in the human resources that causes difference between the expected benefits and the actual attained benefits. The people related issues are the major challenge in the implementation of ERP systems and realization of benefits from the ERP systems. A nother issues are related to the integration, software and hardware. A few essential considerations are inadequate discipline, inappropriate training and improper change management that must be considered for the realization of benefits from the implementation of ERP systems. Even after the successful implementation of the ERP systems within the organizations, they still face issues related to the change management that continues to prevent them from the realization of benefits. For instance, the implementation of SAP R/3 involves extensive methods of change management. According to Seethamraju (2015), ERP emphasizes upon the eight concerning parts of ERP, supply chain management with ERP systems and the market of ERP. Chofreh et al (2014) stated that ERP implementation is the most effective strategy of implementing and advocating the partition of the ERP projects in several small processes. However, Pai and Rane (2014) studied the post implementation of ERP systems in order to understand which ERP systems provide benefits to the organizations after the implementation of ERP systems. It was found that the management agencies are crucial in the realization of benefits from the ERP systems. On the other hand, Leon (2014) emphasized upon the changes that the management and the structure of an organizations face after the implementation of ERP systems within the organizations. The several barriers that the organizations faced when they implemented ERP systems are the requirement of the coordination of the financial processes, maintenance of competitiven ess and integration of the business processes. Besides, an enterprise resource planning framework has been acknowledged similarly for helping associations to improve their regard by joining of activities inside a firm by influencing it to realize the fitting practices for every procedure in business, knowing the standard strategies, influencing single data to source bringing about lesser redirection. Research recommends that there was an extension of 40% inside association mechanical technology while executing ERP alongside a diminishment of roughly 65% in making control work (Kerzner 2013). Consequently, due to this reason different organizations over the globe are demonstrating distinct fascination in such huge structures for business reason. It appears that present associations like to recognize the significance of helpful and correct information since it permits their work force to adequately and effectively keep up their part while picking their feasible decisions amid practices. For instance, several executives of different endeavors were drawn closer by Accenture as an endeavor to comprehend the utilization of enterprise resource planning by association and the ways they utilize it with the end goal of improving the execution of their business alongside their practices that enable them to keep up their worth. It was discovered that because of their execution of such bold system of information brought about quality creation, however certain different associations affirmed equal benefits than most different associations. One investigation of 2006, included 450 managers from roughly 370 associations, who essentially concentrated on the recognized components of their ERP structure that enhanced their business operations (Galliers and Leidner 2014). They likewise distinguished their utilization of systems so as a method for enhancing division and intensity. In other words, for associations to enhance their benefits from the activities in regards to business intelligence, researchers have concocted a guide that talks about utilization of business intelligence and enables organizations to propel their business intelligence; the approach for a guide that includes advancement of Business Intelligence Maturity Models. This model viably aides the association to improve their procedure of controlling corporate data alongside opening up the benefits that their association procures from their utilization of business knowledge. On a yearly premise, associations are perceived for their utilization of business intelligence and are granted with awards. Hence, one can expect an association that has gotten such an award to be profoundly developed according to the model. In other words, Sykes, Venkatesh and Johnson (2014) stated that enterprise information frameworks for enhancing the working productivity of a particular firm offer administration stage of unmistakable nature. These frameworks of data have a wide use in a few fields and upgrade the venture activities effectiveness of improvisation. The execution of ERP frameworks however do challenge the associations yet acknowledging actual as opposed to expected advantages of the procedure can help in taking into account the challenge. Advantages of ERP implementation To enjoy the advantages of ERP implementation, one is required to understand that ERP systems are somewhat befuddle programming groups that provide a back up to several authoritative functions of an organization. Therefore, few segments affect the connection amongst a progressive productivity and interest for ERP. To get full preferred standpoint, the ERP suppliers propose that organizations must execute their functions with immaterial changes. Consequently, several organizations have obtained the best suitable approach that help them to remove the programmings for each methodology or restrictions that is picked. At the end of the day, they utilize a planned approach of corporate structure that helps them to sort immensely essential limits of business for the association (Seo 2013). Factors that influence ERP systems Benefit Realization With regards to the colossal improvement that ERP has experienced since the 1990s, affiliations have gone over a couple of troubles while applying the ERP framework. Research suggests that a huge part of the worldwide relationship and in addition a couple of other medium and small organizations have now begun to execute and use ERP. In any case, it is vital to grasp that regardless of ERP's promising central focuses, for instance, progressive advantages and great speculation of capital, ERP utilization may not by any stretch of the imagination constantly be productive. One downside to it would be the deferment in design due to its execution close by extended budgetary spending design. Hence, theories prescribe that ERP execution have much of the time neglected to give affiliations their ordinary results or comes about and finish their own specific targets (Zeng and Skibniewski 2013). While standing out ERP from other data systems, one critical issue ascending in the use of ERP is eccentrics or unpredictability of the kind of innovation being used nearby its comparability and standardization. This is furthermore expanded by issues caused by humans, for instance, the hierarchical culture inside an affiliation, resistance of workers towards change, the irregularity of the business frames, any kind of attempted bobble, the commitment towards the wander by the best organization and various others; these are communicated to be among the most generally perceived risk factors that may incite failed use of ERP. One known system inside business organization is ERP, that not simply outfits a relationship with the upsides of keeping up and finishing time limits yet as also empower them to keep up supportive correspondence (Jacobs and Chase 2013). Beside the examination that has especially revolved around the favorable circumstances and components of the ERP structure, the go ing with includes some examination on use of the "second wave". A couple of factors that should empower relationship to enlighten their definitive idea incorporate programming system plot, customer incorporation and training, aptitude mix, advancement and innovation arranging, affiliation fit and venture control and organization. Remembering the ultimate objective to look at the danger factors separating points of interest affirmation related to ERP structures, a multileveled approach was grasped for collecting information with the help of fundamental periods of examination going before starting a more basic in-detail examination of a picked logical investigation (Seo 2013). As demonstrated by an exploratory research drove by Nofal and Yusof (2013), unmistakably the matter of ERP is organized broadly under three noteworthy gatherings, which are far reaching of dealers giving the item to ERP, the integrators of system empowering the item utilization and the affiliation related clients. In this examination, the interviewees from all these predefined social affairs of accomplices were moved closer to coordinate 17 meets by and large. From this examination, clearly the ERP systems higher cost was confirmed by each one of these social affairs recommending that favorable position affirmation is of elaborative importance to various associations yet in the meantime the points of interest deliverance from various utilization related to ERP were low bafflingly. IT was moreover reported by an examination performed by Altamony et al (2016) that around 85 percent of examinations of ERP dissect customization of ERP and a couple of various makers confide in taking a ga nder at the purposes of intrigue passed on through this customization. The meaning of benefits management is the procedure by which an association can sort out and oversee in a way that the IT utilization in the most suitable way is observed. There have been a few investigations created to address models and systems that can help in dealing with the entire benefits realized from ERP procedure of administration. Indeed, even after these instruments are accessible, still different associations have not picked up the capacity of making an interpretation of them into working practices adequately (Elbardan, Ali and Ghoneim 2016). The model of Cranfield process is the most popular and generally utilized model in benefits realization. The principle component of this model for benefits realization lies in the system of helpful reliance. This model has been acknowledged to provide advantage by considering related variables. The system of BDN is intended for permitting the aims of investment and to recognize the advantages coming about because of it to connect it in a structured way to the functions of a business according to the prerequisites of an association. The figure of this system is given beneath: Figure 1: Benefits dependency network (Source: Nofal and Yusof 2013) As indicated by a few studies, there are different obstacles to realization of benefits under ERP frameworks, which can be removed by utilizing Benefit Management models comprehensive of elements such as change administration lacking, insufficiency of internal staff, assets poor prioritization, poor business performance, overseeing applications ineffectively and even adjustments performed in an inappropriate way (Shao, Feng and Hu 2016). Difference between actual and expected ERP usage benefits Several advantages are accessible for organizations that implement ERP. Diminishing closure of finance cycle was the essential advantage that organizations expected to obtain. High evaluating is likewise given to administration and their confirmation is given in the accompanying figure which has been outlined by an examination performed by Khan, Dong and Zhang (2015): Figure 2: Difference between actual and expected ERP usage benefits (Source: Khan, Dong and Zhang 2015) Additionally, there has been clear difference existing between those organizations expecting for accomplishing something through ERP frameworks and those, which really are gaining through usage of ERP. Associations gain typically different advantages unexpectedly connected with improvement of the business processes. These can be invalidated due to the developing organizations and the ERP framework related involvement with the industrial benchmarks accessibility (Dutot, Bergeron and Raymond 2014). Barriers and challenges related with ERP benefits realization Benefits realization hindrances are comprehensive of deterrents identified with inappropriate software utility. The greater part of the issues however has a connection to issues of individuals in the association. Change administration is the most important barrier, which requires suitable administration. A few analysts have identified that the projects that build up a positive conduct towards data frameworks introduction are vital elements for the successful implementation of an ERP system. This has made organizations to concentrate in an improved way on the methodologies of change management. This has been alluded by Al-Sarayrah et al (2016) as the re-building procedure of associations and he argued that an essential point of any methodology identified with change management is social change being encouraged first in the association. The method of ASAP execution of SAP concentrated impressively to emphasize on methodologies of change management and comprehensive of different assets supporting the procedure. Improved research is required in the problems that are complicated that include change management and assets assessment for aiding the procedure of change. Contextual analysis of ERP frameworks in Educational institutes In the underlying years of twentieth century, the outstanding Cambridge University was moving towards its prosperity with a sum total of 8000 employees and 10000 students. These faculties and students had to face pressure from individuals living outside and a critical issue of operational spending administration came before the Institute (Alleyne and Lavine 2013). It appeared that because of the government development and consumption in US, there was a decrease in the research expenditure while the educational cost expense increased that became a barrier for several students. These issues may end up plainly in charge of the gap in increment, which will in the long run increment the troubles faced by Cambridge in drawing in stakeholders. Hence, therefore, Cambridge accentuated on changing its present money related system and process by improving their course of action of primary time fiscal information. Hence, Cambridge went more than two decisions; one consolidates making single upgraded system while another alternative was purchasing such a structure from the market. Cambridge purchased an ERP structure in light of the troubles that may rise up out of working up the system, which may turn around the financial cost of the change (Obeidat et al. 2016). This purchased structure basically relied upon the practices undertaken within the corporate business. The advantages seems to come through as one of the major and key disclosures in this examination that grants change of the basic leadership process. It was found that the affiliations that are considered to keep up top execution have utilized their data and examination commandingly to enhance their basic leadership. Such disclosures are discussed by Sarno et al (2015) that is seen as exceptional among different business expert firms. They drove a general study of more than 1500 principle information officers and communicated that business knowledge has ended up being maybe a champion among the most clear and fundamental necessity for business affiliations when they included ERP frameworks. ERP Implementation process inside the University The execution of an ERP system, to be particular SAP was begun by Cambridge in the basic time of 1995. The basic point was to release the changing course of action of area organization at Cambridge as for SAP central records. The second execution point was on extending the DLCS over the school and after that apply the ERP structure. A gathering containing imperative and capable specialists from the staff of discussion and relationship from authority of IT and association inside Cambridge establishment was developed by Cambridge for measuring the ERP structures from the perspective of a couple of sellers for picking the most fitting one for the association (Antero 2015). Finally, it was picked by Cambridge that both SAP and Oracle were the main two dealers, which suited the essentials of ERP structures providers especially for the present issues that the association went up against. A considerable offer in the market is held by Cambridge and this association had more care in the business aggregate with best adequacy, which recommended that the association had legitimate information of SAP and could utilize more forward workplaces of contemporary nature. SAP R/3 was picked by Cambridge while considering each one of the reviews open for all the picked dealers regarding picking appropriate execution of ERP (Cao, Nicolaou and Bhattacharya 2013). A couple of troubles stood up to by associations working in the corporate range that more often work in more prominent focused circumstances recognized issues with financing interestingly with a couple of other non-advantage parts, which have made sense of how to get advantage from the ERP systems all through the earlier decade. The instructive establishments are inspired by the cases of conquering difficulty and they have developed a slant to realize systems of ERP appropriately with same targets that can help in growing corporate part gathering, for example, increasing the operational viability while cutting down the expenses. From this time forward, Cambridge executed and grasped ERP. As demonstrated by Maier, Laumer and Weinert (2015), Cambridge has appropriately placed assets into completing ERP to extend their institutional business capacities; ask about recommends that more than $5 billion has been put by Cambridge in the execution of ERP in the past couple of years. At the pr esent time, the traders of ERP continue expanding their thing's augmentation by extending the amount of things in the market as indicated by the extended and present day need of the market. A couple of instances of these things include SAP and ORACLE programming. Also, consider that the use of ERP in Cambridge has been regarded and has been a testing assignment. In an examination, it was discovered that the use of ERP had wound up being unsuccessful in around 60-80% of educational establishments (Seo 2013). ERP neglected to address the issues of Cambridge and the results had not wound up being agreeable; along these lines, moreover underlining the way that it was at first made just for the corporate business affiliations. Regardless of the way that ERP has the capacity of giving a couple of customization options, these decisions are in charge of expanding the danger of disappointment. The cost of actualizing an ERP framework furthermore defers the execution arranging. Also, some researchers have moreover communicated that ERP usage provoke a couple of various weights and impacted the universities in various diverse ways; these new issues are simply poor upon what the sc hool sees them as. Conclusion It can be concluded that despite, several organizations use almost same ERP systems, the level of customization differs and so does the advantages and disadvantages derived from the ERP systems. It is only when the particular factors are incorporated in the processes, the benefits are realized from the ERP systems. The importance of ERP systems cannot be ignored due to the significant objective they serve. Therefore, the report mentioned the characteristics of ERP systems and the factors that aid in the realization of benefits. Several business organizations and educational institutes have embraced ERP inside their administration framework to administer complex operations effortlessly. A few colleges are nowadays encountering strain to provide superior quality services pertaining to education to their students at lower or least cost; be it due to the reduced investments from the legislature or lessening stakeholder increments. Because of these reasons, ERP has turned out to be increa singly engaging such establishments since it enables them to achieve their objectives along with maintaining their standards (Seo 2013). Both, corporate associations and colleges are examining the advantages of usage of ERP all over the globe. For organizations, the fundamental reasons incorporate upgrading their educational framework while restructuring their business forms. However, in the corporate part, reengineering is significantly less demanding than in colleges. The organizational culture and the framework of the association mentioned in the case study are highly influenced under the execution of ERP. A formal and various leveled process in corporate sector as to settling on choices adequately, helped in making the ENGCO work in arrangement with the institutionalized procedure and in the long run winding up more effectively in reengineering process at a bigger scale than that of Cambridge that forces an autonomic condition. With respect to this, the change and relationship administration plays a fundamental and noteworthy part in the usage of ERP in the educational institutes and the business organizations. References: Alleyne, P. and Lavine, M., 2013. Factors influencing accountants' behavioural intentions to use and actual usage of enterprise resource planning systems in a global development agency.Journal of Financial Reporting Accounting,11(2), pp.179-200. Al-Mashari, M. and Al-Mosheleh, H., 2015, April. Enterprise Resource Planning of Business Process Systems. InUKAIS(p. 2). Al-Sarayrah, S., Obeidat, B.Y., Al-Salti, Z. and Kattoua, T., 2016. The effect of culture on strategic human resource management practices: A theoretical perspective.International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research,7(4), pp.704-716. Altamony, H., Tarhini, A., Al-Salti, Z., Gharaibeh, A. and Elyas, T., 2016. The relationship between change management strategy and successful enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementations: A theoretical perspective.International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research,7(4), pp.690-703. Antero, M., 2015.A Multi-case Analysis of the Development of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems (ERP) Business Practices. Copenhagen Business SchoolCopenhagen Business School, Institut for IT-LedelseDepartment of IT Management. Cao, J., Nicolaou, A.I. and Bhattacharya, S., 2013. A longitudinal examination of enterprise resource planning system post-implementation enhancements.Journal of Information Systems,27(1), pp.13-39. Chofreh, A.G., Goni, F.A., Shaharoun, A.M., Ismail, S. and Kleme, J.J., 2014. Sustainable enterprise resource planning: imperatives and research directions.Journal of Cleaner Production,71, pp.139-147. Dutot, V., Bergeron, F. and Raymond, L., 2014. Information management for the internationalization of SMEs: An exploratory study based on a strategic alignment perspective.International Journal of Information Management,34(5), pp.672-681. Elbardan, H., Ali, M. and Ghoneim, A., 2016. Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Introduction and Internal Auditing Legitimacy: An Institutional Analysis.Information Systems Management,33(3), pp.231-247. Galliers, R.D. and Leidner, D.E. eds., 2014.Strategic information management: challenges and strategies in managing information systems. Routledge. Hoch, J.E. and Dulebohn, J.H., 2013. Shared leadership in enterprise resource planning and human resource management system implementation.Human Resource Management Review,23(1), pp.114-125. Jacobs, R. and Chase, R., 2013.Operations and supply chain management. McGraw-Hill Higher Education. Kerzner, H., 2013.Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley Sons. Khan, S.A.R., Dong, Q. and Zhang, Y., 2015. Classification of important and critical factors in enterprise resource planning.Life science journal, Zhengzhou University,12. Leon, A., 2014.Enterprise resource planning. McGraw-Hill Education. Maier, C., Laumer, S. and Weinert, C., 2015. Enterprise resource planning systems induced stress: a comparative empirical analysis with young and elderly SAP users. InWirtschaftsinformatik(pp. 1391-1406). Nofal, M.I. and Yusof, Z.M., 2013. Integration of business intelligence and enterprise resource planning within organizations.Procedia Technology,11, pp.658-665. Obeidat, B.Y., Hashem, L., Alansari, I., Tarhini, A. and Al-Salti, Z., 2016. The effect of knowledge management uses on total quality management practices: A theoretical perspective.Journal of Management and strategy,7(4), p.18. Pai, A. and Rane, S., 2014. Development and implementation of maintenance management module of enterprise resource planning in maintenance of power plant.International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management,5(4), pp.534-543. Sarno, R., DJENI, C.A., MUKHLASH, I. and SUNARYONO, D., 2015. DEVELOPING A WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING.Journal of Theoretical Applied Information Technology,72(3). Seethamraju, R., 2015. Adoption of software as a service (SaaS) enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems in small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs).Information systems frontiers,17(3), pp.475-492. Seo, G., 2013.Challenges in implementing enterprise resource planning (ERP) system in large organizations: similarities and differences between corporate and university environment(Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology). Shao, Z., Feng, Y. and Hu, Q., 2016. Effectiveness of top management support in enterprise systems success: a contingency perspective of fit between leadership style and system life-cycle.European Journal of Information Systems,25(2), pp.131-153. Shaul, L. and Tauber, D., 2013. Critical success factors in enterprise resource planning systems: Review of the last decade.ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR),45(4), p.55. Sykes, T.A., Venkatesh, V. and Johnson, J.L., 2014. Enterprise system implementation and employee job performance: Understanding the role of advice networks.MIS quarterly,38(1). Tarhini, A., Ammar, H. and Tarhini, T., 2015. Analysis of the critical success factors for enterprise resource planning implementation from stakeholders perspective: A systematic review.International Business Research,8(4), p.25. Tian, F. and Xu, S.X., 2015. How Do Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Affect Firm Risk? Post-Implementation Impact.Mis Quarterly,39(1). Zeng, Y. and Skibniewski, M.J., 2013. Risk assessment for enterprise resource planning (ERP) system implementations: a fault tree analysis approach.Enterprise Information Systems,7(3), pp.332-353.